Financially brunette Kate Forbes

Not Legally Blonde, but Financially Brunette Kate Forbes MSP was catapulted into the national spotlight when presenting the Scottish Government’s draft budget today, whose budget content we must presume was Derek Mackay’s (who has just resigned as Finance and Economy Secretary) and therefore as unimpressive as any SNP budget constrained in borrowing powers by the bad £ fiscal framework deal that Mackay, Swinney and Sturgeon had surrendered to – but whose presentation style was impressively her own.

I am offering to help Forbes, whether as her new special adviser or otherwise, to demand and to deliver the scale of Scottish Government borrowing powers (capped at no less than 8% of Scottish GDP, about £14 billion per year, interest-free and with no repayments) that would allow for budgeting for strong growth and prosperity. If the UK refuses to concede any such proper borrowing powers to Holyrood then full borrowing powers can be secured by establishing a new Scottish currency.

With or without my help, we’ll soon see if Forbes has more substance for economic leadership than the insubstantial Mackay.

Forbes has now been tipped as the favourite for the next First Minister of Scotland, to succeed Sturgeon, whenever it is that Sturgeon decides to step down, or possibly steps up if she is crowned Queen Nicola of Scots or is elected as Scottish President of a Republic of Scotland, if and when the SNP decide to oust the Queen from Scotland.

Excuse me if I indulge my radical feminist fantasies but it occurs to me that Kate Forbes would be great serving in my fantasy Women’s Militia too.

“A well regulated Women’s Militia, being necessary to the security of Women’s Rule, the right of Women to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Scottish politics just got a little bit more interesting, especially for a single gentleman with an eye for the ladies like me.

Update, 12th March 2020

KATE FORBES – Lipstick on a pig

Yesterday’s UK budget continues the Tories’ economic warfare against Scots, as expected, but Kate Forbes’s meek response to that budget dashed all hopes of any political economics leadership from her, proving that Forbes is incapable of being anything other than a puppet for the UK civil service and she will continue Sturgeon’s, Swinney’s and Mackay’s  SNP craven surrender of Scottish government borrowing powers to the UK.

Forbes has ignored my advice and so I am afraid that her political honeymoon is over as far as I am concerned and she must answer for her terrible policy decisions which are –

  • Forbes has refused to demand proper £ borrowing powers for the Scottish government – about £14 billion/year, interest-free and no repayments.
  • Forbes has refused to repudiate the bad deal fiscal framework agreement negotiated by Swinney in 2016 and signed up to by Sturgeon.
  • Forbes has refused to commit to establishing a new Scottish currency now, throwing away an important economic lever.

Forbes is as bad as Derek Mackay in a skirt, from an economic failure point of view. Sturgeon’s government will remain puppets of the UK civil service, serving the UK, betraying the Scots.

If Scots are ever to stop being robbed blind by the UK it won’t be Forbes doing.

1 Comment

Filed under Finance and Economy

Abusing teenagers in love since 2007, the puritanical SNP government to “overhaul” itself

That would be “overhauling” the cruelty imposed by the SNP governments since 2007, presumably?

The National: Nicola Sturgeon pledges to improve Scotland’s care system

The BBC: Sturgeon pledges radical overhaul of children in care system

Sturgeon sitting with those girls looks like butter would not melt in her mouth but she voted for puritanical legislation that, on the face of it, could lock up any older children – for up to 10 years – for engaging in consensual sexual conduct with their classmates, boyfriends / girlfriends etc.

SCHEDULE 2 – PENALTIES – Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009

Sitting on the sofa with the First Minister one day then soon after experimenting with love, as teenagers may be tempted to do, arrested and forced into the dock of the High Court for a sentence of up to 10 years imprisonment!

Sturgeon is, so to speak, the wicked witch-finder general of the cult of her devolved Scottish government – clueless on delivering independence but spending £billions on a sadistic police state to witch-hunt and to hurt young Scots for doing what comes natural to them.

Why did Sturgeon come into politics – just to hurt young people?

Is her envy as a barren woman who missed her chance to have a family of her own and who will stop at nothing in revenge to punish teenagers with up to 10 years in jail to stop them from trying to start their own family?

Some teenage mums can, the SNP’s Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009 legislation suggests, be locked up for years in prison – just for daring to become a mum – and possibly driven to suicide – that is the cruel fantasy of Nicola Sturgeon that she and her party has made the law of Scotland in this United Kingdom that the SNP are puppets of.

UK puppets – satirical view of Nicola “Soo” Sturgeon and Peter “Sooty” Murrell.

Abortions are to be insisted upon to appease the Sturgeon death-cult wherever possible, sadly.

If Sturgeon couldn’t have a family, she will, it seems, get her revenge on life by doing her level best to stop younger Scots from having families too and the young people in her care are the ones she can pick on most easily.

Is that why she came into politics – to kill the sex drive, to kill love, to kill fetuses and if babies “regrettably” must be born, “why not” have their mothers kill themselves in prison?

No wonder the birth rate is in decline with such a puritanical hostility to sex from the First Minister. If Scots let her, this is a First Minister who will drive the birth rate down to the point where the Scots will suffer an existential crisis!

For Sturgeon’s puritanical devolution cult, as for Edward Longshanks, “the trouble with Scotland is that it is full of Scots”!

This beautiful photograph illustrates the kind of thing that it seems Sturgeon and the puritanical SNP hate most of all and want the law to allow judges to lock teenage girls up for, for up to ten years.

Daily Record: ‘She’s changed me completely’ Teen pregnant at 14 says daughter inspired her to work hard at school and excel in exams

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Keir Starmer is the WORST choice for Labour leader

Starmer misled the Labour Party as Corbyn’s Shadow Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union from October 2016 – misleading the party into offending Leave voters by remoaning, remoaning and remoaning again to obstruct any Brexit deal getting through parliament.

How Keir Starmer turned his back on Leave voters

In particular, Starmer badly advised Corbyn to whip Labour MPs to vote against Tory Brexit deals, when the only clever whip was to abstain, otherwise a free vote should have been granted so that Labour MPs could reflect their constituency feelings on the Remain vs Leave issue.

Starmer misled Labour into falling into the Tory trap which was to make Labour look like they were obstructing the democratic victory of Leave voters (in England and Wales).

Starmer handed Johnson his 2019 general election winning slogan “Get Brexit Done!”

So there can be no worse choice than Starmer for Labour leader. The man is the kiss of death for Labour.

“If recent history proves anything, however, it’s that academic prowess doesn’t always translate into political acumen. As the man who had Corbyn’s ear on Brexit, he was Britain’s most influential Remainer. He was the architect of Labour’s “six tests on Brexit”, a transparently semantic straitjacket: it was a device Labour could use to try and lever the government out of office, while claiming to support enacting the outcome of the referendum – despite never voting for any version of it. The public aren’t idiots; it was clear what was going on. Starmer’s plan was, in common terms, too smart for its own good.

Over time, Starmer overplayed his Brexit hand. Jacked up on e-petitions and well-attended People’s Vote marches (because jolly days in central London are always an accurate gauge of the electorate), he – like many Remainers sensed a point in time where the referendum result might be overturned. I wonder how he views that opportunism now, when a Labour abstention on the Withdrawal Agreement Bill at any point would’ve already had us living in the kind of tepid Brexit he claimed to favour.”
Geoff Norcott, “Keir Starmer says he’s working class. Sadly, the only thing he could make from scratch is fresh pasta”, The Independent, 22nd January 2020.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Susan Deacon GONE! Next, SACK Iain Livingstone as Chief Constable of Police Scotland.

I offered to serve as Chair of the Scottish Police Authority and my first act, which should have been Susan Deacon’s act, but wasn’t and this is where she went wrong on day one, would be to SACK IAIN LIVINGSTONE as acting Chief Constable and not allow him to be considered for the post of Chief Constable.


I knew that acting Chief Constable Iain Livingstone was not up to the job, before Deacon was appointed, because Livingstone had incompetently commanded his officers so as to arrest me for something as trivial as a flirtatious email to a lady SNP Councillor, who has since resigned in disgrace after bearing false witness against me in Aberdeen Sheriff Court.

Livingstone has been mismanaging Police Scotland as Gestapo Scotland, meaning prioritising arresting political activists who are in any way critical of the SNP leadership.

It goes without saying that Livingstone’s Gestapo Scotland has neglected the proper duties of police such as to enforce drugs laws, resulting in Scotland having the worst death rate from drug abuse in the European Union.

I’m still available to serve, whether as a replacement for Deacon or as the next Chief Constable.

Read my blog posts for the details of how Police Scotland is operating as a Gestapo in Scotland, under Chief Constable Livingstone and the SNP government.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Mackay is demanding much too little money for Holyrood’s credit limit

TOO LITTLE. TOO LATE.

Pig-ignorant Mackay is demanding much too little money and too late to save his job.

Satirises Derek Makay, happy as a pig in a pigsty

Mackay is demanding only the ability to rack up £1 billion of debt a year – that’s about 0.6% of Scottish GDP – peanuts, an insult to Scottish savers, most of whose savings would still be robbed blind by the UK.

We should be demanding the ability to rack up about £14 billion of debt a year – that’s about 8% of GDP – that’s proper government borrowing powers.

Mackay wants an increase in the overdraft to only £10 billion.

We should want NO overdraft limit whatsoever, only the yearly cap which can be borrowed every year indefinitely, with NO interest payments and NO repayment of the sums borrowed.

Pig-ignorant Mackay wants to pay interest and to repay the sums borrowed – pig ignorant about economics and how government borrowing works. Mackay thinks like a toon cooncillor who has to beg to borrow.

Mackay doesn’t want to govern like a government which is in charge of its own central bank and can borrow its own currency at will. That’s not a borrowing power that a toon cooncillor like Mackay would know what to do with.

Mackay is a pipsqueak of a Finance and Economy Secretary, completely out of his depth and he must be sacked for the good of the Scottish economy.

The bad deal Fiscal Framework Agreement

For years, the Scottish economy has been stagnant, with very weak growth because in 2016, the SNP made a bad deal with the UK which crushed the Scottish government’s powers to borrow money from the UK.

MSPs could have renounced the bad deal at any time. MSPs could have fought for a better £ deal with the UK, or set up a new Scottish currency and central bank to borrow from at will, but they didn’t. MSPs were too slow and too stupid and they took bad advice from a clueless university bureaucrat by the name of Anton Muscatelli, whom Glasgow University and the City of Glasgow would be miles better without.

So MSPs stuck with the bad deal which framed Holyrood budgets for austerity and weak growth, year after year. Scots suffered austerity but Sturgeon told lies and blamed only the UK for austerity when it was her signature on the bad deal. She had agreed with austerity in writing.

Finally, in September 2019, the penny finally dropped for one MSP – the new Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard, who wrote an opinion piece in the Scotsman which criticised the SNP’s bad deal that Kezia Dugdale, the previous Scottish Labour leader never had the wits to disagree with. Dugdale resigned as Labour leader and an MSP to work for Muscatelli whose bad advice she is presumably still taking. Dugdale was an economically-ignorant celebrity and she got herself out of Holyrood!

“SNP have locked us into a bad deal” – Richard Leonard & Peter Dow agree.

John Swinney and Nicola Sturgeon have signed up to a bad financial settlement, says Richard Leonard, writing in the Scotsman on 24th September 2019. Peter Dow agrees and adds …

Richard is right. The SNP’s bad deal fiscal framework crushes the Scottish Parliament’s borrowing powers, framing Holyrood austerity budgets to fail the Scottish economy, making it all but impossible to deliver growth and prosperity for the people of Scotland, which is totally unacceptable to anyone who cares for Scots.

I’ve argued that a good deal fiscal framework would allow for Scottish government £ Sterling borrowing powers capped at no less than an average of 8% of Scottish GDP – about £14 billion per year – borrowed interest-free, with no repayments, the sums borrowed simply added to the Scottish national debt – in other words, macro-economic borrowing powers for Holyrood, akin to those of a sovereign government with its own central bank borrowing powers.

8% GDP is not unreasonable for government borrowing to fund its fiscal deficit and is about what the UK borrowed on average for the 5 years following the global financial crisis of 2008, which allowed the UK economy to grow strongly out of recession.

The UK could of course refuse such a good deal £ Sterling fiscal framework, if and when the Scottish government finally demand one such – in which case establishing a Scottish currency and Scottish central bank is the appropriate response for the Scottish Government and Parliament to take. There is no sign that Richard Leonard has reached nor crossed that particular bridge yet but he has come this far so one can but hope that he or the next Scottish Labour leader will get there one day.

See also – Financially brunette Kate Forbes

Updates

23rd June 2020: Alex Neil on Holyrood’s borrowing limits

“it is for the Scottish Government and the other devolved Governments in the UK to be able to borrow the money that will be needed for economic recovery directly from the Bank of England, and on exactly the same terms and conditions as the UK Government.
… Now is an opportunity for the UK Government to give the Scottish Government the same borrowing powers. That would mean, like the UK Government, paying no interest; having no timescale for re-payment, like the UK Government; and having the power to write off loans from the Bank of England, as the UK Government already did with money that it borrowed for the recession. That is where the money should come from. … Throw the fiscal framework out the window. It is no longer fit for purpose. Give us some real short-term powers that we can use to save the Scottish economy.”
Alex Neil MSP, Scottish Parliament, 23rd June 2020

Finally, a repudiation of the bad deal fiscal framework from an SNP MSP – Alex Neil speaking like a true economist. 🙂

Press and Journal: Coronavirus: SNP MSP says Holyrood borrowing limits must be ‘thrown out the window’

1 Comment

Filed under Finance and Economy

Students and the public shouldn’t support ANY university staff pay claim or strike

As a science graduate of Edinburgh University, a former Glasgow college lecturer and a mature post-graduate science student who was unjustly excluded from both Universities in Aberdeen (AU & RGU) leaving me with the worst-possible reference (“we don’t even allow him on campus”), from which my career as a scientist never recovered, I have a unique perspective on university pay disputes.

Whilst unjustified student exclusions are the fault of mismanagement failing to find a way for people to work together, those unjust exclusions often follow a complaint from a lecturer or department administrator, unwilling to allow tough questions to be asked of staff by “mere students”, however educated and qualified those students may be.

University Principals are those most responsible for hiring lawyers to obtain court orders to enforce exclusions from the campus.

My complaint about the staff in general is that collectively they show no solidarity with excluded students whom one of their fellow staff colleagues may have complained about. The solidarity is always with the tenured staff member to support principals who exclude any student who asks tough questions.

Whilst collective action from staff is often evident to support a wage claim, never in a million years can one imagine collective action by university staff in support of excluded students.

Such excluded students are left to rot on the dole for the rest of their lives, or tormented by Jobcentre staff and made mentally ill by having their benefits cut off. Such individuals as myself are the “skeletons in the cupboard” of academia – only I am one such skeleton who is still blowing the whistle!

So that’s why I don’t support such pay claims, as I explained to a BBC Radio Scotland phone-in program some years ago.

Peter Dow (on radio) re: Scottish Universities Pay Dispute

Lecturers and students who didn’t welcome my tough questions, typically complained that I was “disruptive”, misrepresenting my constructive line of questioning.

They couldn’t go complaining to management about my “constructive” questions without looking foolish, now could they?

Better to save face by pretending that I was “disruptive”, embellish their account so as to paint me in as bad a light as they can.

Academics claiming that they “don’t want” students excluded is insincere when they never lift a finger to oppose or reverse exclusions.

Academics who claim they cannot imagine dishonesty in their colleagues either lack imagination or are dishonest themselves.

In my case, academics testified as witnesses for the prosecution, for my exclusion, as to my alleged “disruptive” behaviour at lectures etc. so my experience is to the contrary of any claims that academic staff “do not want exclusion”.

“Gown” versus “Town”

Academics (“Gown”) are willing to take industrial action action against the university management (“Town”) in support of wages and conditions, so it is untrue to pretend that “Gown” doesn’t ever interfere with “Town” management decisions ever.

The contrast is the courage when selfishly striking for university staff’s own wages compared to the indifference or moral cowardice in not striking, not even speaking out, in solidarity with excluded students.

Academics don’t speak out politically in support of excluded students but have misled the polity by pretending that excluded students can be “expected to do very well”, whereas the deck is very much stacked against us when we are excluded.

My career as a scientist was ruined, long term unemployed and on the sick, with no social life, no friends, no family of my own.

I was excluded from the University of Aberdeen from 1991 and the Robert Gordon University in 2003 and have never been included anywhere else that I wanted to be as a first choice since then.

It is too late for me to expect the experience of decades of exclusion since then not to determine my future. It has determined the last 28 years of my life, ruining it completely.

My life has been totally destroyed by my exclusion!

“Study at the Open University”

Having left my college lecturing job from boredom, I didn’t want to do an O.U. course, still don’t, because I lacked and still lack a social life.

When you are socially isolated, you need the company of your peers. You want to make friends, perhaps find a partner in life to start a family with.

What you don’t need is your peers excluding you from their company because you might ask some tough questions.

What I need is solidarity against the mismanagement of the Universities of Aberdeen and the mismanagement of the courts which prevented me from holding them to account.

I need restorative action which removes the bad management and lets me back on campus in Aberdeen to put the record straight at every public meeting on campus, where I can speak out and reduce the reputation of the past years of mismanagement to the “lowest of the low” which is appropriate.

I have been grievously wronged and the wrong-doers must be held to account.

There must be justice and accountability and compensation, though I fear the compensation I would demand would break the Bank of England but no apology nor compensation whatsoever has ever been offered to me.

So the solution here must be to remove the accreditation of all UK universities and of the standing of the kingdom and monarchy which gave them their royal charters that they never deserved in the first place.

The Windsor royal family must be exiled from Britain before we, the people, can then turn in a “year zero” to confronting the UK elites who have abused their positions of trust in the kingdom.

We’ll see how brave academics etc. are when they don’t have a fascist police state to exclude their critics.

Meanwhile, Ivory Tower fascists do not deserve any wage nor any pension – social security payments only until they put their own house in order.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

No, Spanish fascists may not take our Clara Ponsati political prisoner!

Any request by the Spanish fascist police state to send an arrest and extradition request to Scotland to dare to take our beloved Clara Ponsati political prisoner must be rebuffed in the strongest terms by the Crown Office without hesitation.

Lord Were-Wolffe

Lord Were-Wolffe, James Wolffe, Sturgeon’s Lord Advocate

If it is not, if James Wolffe, Alison di Rollo and David Harvie entertain such a request from Spain then they should be sacked by the First Minister, for violating human rights law and for gross incompetence in resisting the fascist abuse of legal process.

If any officer of Police Scotland dares to arrest Clara Ponsati then Susan Deacon and Iain Livingstone should be sacked by the Justice Secretary.

If Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf sit on their hands and do nothing, just allow the officials they have appointed to proceed with any such arrest and extradition attempt then Sturgeon must be dismissed as First Minister by the Scottish Parliament and that will remove Yousaf as Justice Secretary too.

If Sturgeon sacks Wolffe as Lord Advocate but he tries to cling onto office because the Queen won’t rubber stamp Sturgeon’s order then the Queen must be banned from Scotland, the Scottish Parliament calling on any military to enforce the ban.

Try to understand that we are dealing with fascists here and democracy cannot afford to play footsie with fascists.

Fascists need to be nipped in the bud. NOW!

EIMsseQWoAI3ONI

Peter Dow

Science and Politics
Aberdeen
http://scot.tk

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Plan B for Scottish Independence

1. Follow Peter Dow’s Road Map to Scottish Independence (explained below).

2. Win home rule of broadcasting, set up a Scottish Broadcasting Corporation.

3. Finally hold indyref2 with the level playing field of fair broadcasting coverage of the strongest arguments for independence that the BBC would never broadcast – all the many arguments against Queen, Kingdom and Empire, explaining how and why an independent Scotland governed democratically as a Scottish republic with an elected president would make all the difference to Scottish independence and to dealing with problems of the incompetence of royalist misgovernment and mismanagement.

The Road Map to Scottish Independence

We march for independence raising our own Scottish flags in defiance of the tyranny of the United Kingdom.

We note the unjustified arrests in Scotland by the United Kingdom police force styled as “Police Scotland”.

We note the unjustified imprisonments in United Kingdom prisons styled as “Her Majesty’s Prisons”.

We are offended by these UK violations of the constitutional rights and freedoms of the People of Scotland.

We assert and act in defence of the constitutional sovereignty of the People of Scotland.

We overthrow the misrule of the United Kingdom and its monarch, Queen Elizabeth.

We ban Queen Elizabeth and her family from Scotland!

We call on any military to enforce our ban by using all means necessary!

We unilaterally declare that Scotland is an independent country!

We call on the Scottish Parliament to agree a motion in similar terms.

Road Map to Scottish Independence

Road Map image

The “Gold Standard” for Scottish Independence

The BBC broadcast Ian Blackford at the SNP conference, claiming that his Plan A is the “gold standard”.

I beg to differ.

In my opinion, Plan A, straight from the Alex Salmond playbook, is not the “gold standard”, not with the BBC rigging politics coverage, giving the Queen and her ministers a get-out-of-jail-free card every time.

The 2014 indyref with biased, unionist BBC politics coverage and censorship of the best arguments for independence was the wooden-spoon standard of independence referendum and a unionist trap that the UK puppet Alex Salmond fell right into.

So thanks but no thanks. No more wooden-spoon indyrefs for Scotland.

Scots deserve the true gold standard – a first-ever free-and-fair independence campaign, with fair broadcasting which broadcasts ALL the arguments for independence, broadcasts ALL the arguments against the union of Scotland with a United Kingdom, Queen, monarchy and empire.

The Treachery of Plan A royalists

Sturgeon Betrays Scotland

Standing to sing “God Save the Queen”, the First Minister of Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon, seeks to make Scots subjects of the Queen of England, contrary to the Sovereignty of the People of Scotland, as enshrined in the Declaration of Arbroath, 1320.

Blair Jenkins, OBE

Blair Jenkins, Order of the British Empire

Blair Jenkins, Order of the British Empire, was the Chief Executive of the YES-Scotland campaign in 2014, is shown in the picture with Prince Charles pinning his OBE onto his jacket.

Plan A royalists, like Alex Salmond, Nicola Sturgeon and Blair Jenkins are saying “YES” to monarchy, the most iniquitous form of government, “YES” to inequality, “NO” to a Scottish republic and “NO” to the democratic election of a Scottish President, duty bound to defend the rights of all Scots as equal citizens.

Plan A royalists are traitors against the people of Scotland and that’s why their Plan A campaigns ring hollow with many and will collapse like a house of cards whenever the BBC broadcasts the Queen telling Scots to “think carefully” etc.

The movement for Scottish independence cannot allow the SNP’s Plan A to wreck our chances of winning our freedom once again.

Now we have this Plan B for Scottish independence and I propose that we put this Plan B into effect without further delay.

Peter Dow

Science and Politics
Aberdeen
http://scot.tk

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

BBC rigging Scottish independence referendum with lies and propaganda

The man in the BBC “How to vote in the Scottish referendum” video, to be fair and unbiased should say “If you want Scotland to stay in THE UNITED KINGDOM you put an ‘X’ in the box next to the word ‘NO'”

But the BBC video is not fair, it is biased and so instead the man says “If you want Scotland to stay in BRITAIN you put an ‘X’ in the box next to the word ‘NO'”.

Firstly, geographically, Scotland will stay in Britain, the British Isles, come what may. The Republic of Ireland is still part of the British Isles though that greater part of Ireland left UK political control years ago.

The political choice for Scots is whether we wish to be independent of the United Kingdom or not.

The BBC video conflates geography with politics. They are not the same.

Secondly, even for those Scots with a British political identity, like myself, there are far better political options and futures than maintaining the United Kingdom as is – which better futures the BBC video ignores because the BBC is institutionally biased in favour of the monarchy and kingdom.

Consider a future Britain which was not royalist nor a kingdom but rather democratic and republican. Such a future Britain would become a real possibility for all Britons with the establishment of an independent Scottish republic.

But the BBC, as UK royalist lackeys, ignore the non-UK British future options and always present a royalist, biased and bigoted view of Scotland and Britain and hide the real political choices for Scots and Britons alike.

In addition, this BBC video promotes a SNP peacenik video which DISCREDITS a “YES” vote by misrepresenting all “YES” campaigners as smearing Scots Iraq war heroes as “criminals”. Presumably that’s why the BBC chose this video promote – to wreck chances of a “YES” vote.

The fact that the SNP tolerate this peacenik video being promoted by the BBC as representative of the YES campaign shows that the SNP high command have more interest in keeping hold of their peacenik base than winning support from braveheart Scots & Britons for a YES vote.

Once again we can see the SNP are combining with BBC and UK royalists to sabotage any prospect of real Scottish national independence.

The BBC video is part of the BBC RIGGING the independence referendum, brainwashing pro-British Scots to vote “NO” when actually “YES” is the best choice of vote for anyone who wants the best for Britons in Scotland and in due course for Britons in the rest of Britain too.

I’m strongly pro-British, a British nationalist and THEREFORE I am for Scottish independence and for leaving the UK but staying loyal to my fellow Britons in the process.

British politics like mine is ignored and treated with contempt by the BBC video.

This video is typical of BBC royalist, anti-British TREACHERY which disguises imposing the enemy Windsor monarchy & kingdom upon all Scots and Britons as some kind of “national” process when it is rather an act of treason against the nations which denies Scots and all British home nations even the rights of sovereign nations to elect our own head of state.

It was to be expected that the United Kingdom would act to rig this referendum and this video is an example of how they are rigging it.

Scots therefore should refuse to accept any “No” result of a BBC RIGGED independence referendum that brainwashes Scots-Britons to vote “No” by spreading royalist lies and propaganda.

Loyal Britons should chop the Queen’s head off and send it to the smiling bastard in this BBC video with a note telling him that the Scots-Britons are staying with Britain by the best way possible – by LEAVING the United Kingdom.

Links

The Scottish National Standard Bearer website

Visit the Scotland category of forums in the For Freedom Forums

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The AfPak Mission war on terror strategy blog

I’ve created a new blog with the address “afpakmission.wordpress.com” to match the other AfPak Mission content I have across the web.

So check there for anything new in the category of “Afghanistan” because this will be the last blog entry in the “Afghanistan” category which is posted on the “peterdow.wordpress.com” blog.

Leave a comment

December 21, 2013 · 7:15 pm